我:
“i love programming the games are cool its fun to play them don't you think”
@梁 here are parsing results of your casual English:
So there is one error in parsing this "degraded text":
our parser links "the games" as Object of "programming" which is locally correct, an understandable mistake. But human knows there is a missing punctuation and will link "the games" as Subject of "are", other aspects of parsing seem alright. So "degraded text" does pose some challenges, but a robust parser can still handle most of it.
@梁:
Thank you, @wei. It is very well handled. By the way, it is not my casual English. I copied it from Khan Academy.
@wei, ”Opred“ means predicate as objective, what is "infmod"?
白:
不定式作后置修饰语
我:
对。Opred 是谓词性宾语，包括ing和不定式。
其实那个错误 做细活 是可以改正的 因为 are 对主语的强制性力量 远远超越了作为前面动词宾语的力量。这样就达到人的结构分析水平了。
白:
think怎么next了？这个是个反义疑问句啊。
我:
白老师眼毒，不指出我根本就没注意到呢。那显然是一个 bug：助动当成主动词了。
就事论事 那个应该词典化。
白:
are距离又近，不填主语又不饱和。反倒是programming，不是非有坑不可。
词典化赞同。
【相关】
